How would you apply evidence-based principles when considering experimental treatment options like Responsive Neurostimulation for epilepsy?
Specialty-Specific
Purpose
This question checks your grasp of Evidence-Based Medicine (EBM) and how you handle new treatments in neurosurgery. The interviewer wants to see if you can think critically and balance innovation with patient safety.
Tips
- Start by discussing how you'd review existing literature, even if it's limited, to understand the treatment's efficacy and safety.
- Emphasize the importance of a thorough discussion with the patient about the experimental nature of the treatment, including risks and benefits.
- Highlight the need for a multidisciplinary approach, involving other specialists to ensure comprehensive patient evaluation and support.
Common mistakes
- Don't just express excitement about the technology without addressing its experimental status and the need for evidence.
- Avoid generic statements; be specific about how you'd evaluate the evidence and involve the patient in decision-making.
- Steer clear of suggesting that any new treatment should be used just because it's available; always prioritize patient safety and informed consent.